ઢાંચો:Grading scheme

WikiProject article quality grading scheme

Class	Criteria	Reader's experience	Editing suggestions	Example
FA	The article has attained featured article status. More detailed criteria The article meets the featured article criteria:વિકિપીડિયા:Featured article criteria	Professional, outstanding, and thorough; a definitive source for encyclopedic information.	No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible.	L'incoronazione di Poppea (as of August 2010)
A	The article is well-organized and essentially complete, having been reviewed by impartial reviewers from this WikiProject or elsewhere. Good article status is not a requirement for A-Class. More detailed criteria The article meets the A-Class criteria: વિકિપીડિયા:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment/A-Class criteria	Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject matter would typically find nothing wanting.	Expert knowledge may be needed to tweak the article, and style issues may need addressing. Peer review may help.	102nd Intelligence Wing (as of March 2010)
GA	The article has attained good article status. More detailed criteria The article meets the good article criteria:વિકિપીડિયા:Good article criteria	Useful to nearly all readers, with no obvious problems; approaching (although not equalling) the quality of a professional encyclopedia.	Some editing by subject and style experts is helpful; comparison with an existing featured article on a similar topic may highlight areas where content is weak or missing.	Usain Bolt (as of November 2009)
B	The article is mostly complete and without major issues, but requires some further work to reach good article standards. More detailed criteria The article meets the six B-Class criteria:વિકિપીડિયા:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment/B-Class criteria	Readers are not left wanting, although the content may not be complete enough to satisfy a serious student or researcher.	A few aspects of content and style need to be addressed. Expert knowledge may be needed. The inclusion of supporting materials should also be considered if practical, and the article checked for general compliance with the Manual of Style and related style guidelines.	KV55 (as of November 2009)
C	The article is substantial, but is still missing important content or contains a lot of irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant issues or require substantial cleanup. More detailed criteria The article is better developed in style, structure and quality than Start-Class, but fails one or more of the criteria for B-Class. It may have some gaps or missing elements; need editing for clarity, balance or flow; or contain policy violations such as bias or original research. Articles on fictional topics are likely to be marked as C-Class if they are written from an in-universe perspective.	Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study.	Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and address cleanup issues.	Architecture of Sweden (as of May 2009)
Start	An article that is developing, but which is quite incomplete and, most notably, lacks adequate reliable sources. More detailed criteria The article has a usable amount of good content but is weak in many areas, usually in referencing. Quality of the prose may be distinctly unencyclopedic, and MoS compliance non-existent; but the article should satisfy fundamental content policies such as notability and BLP, and provide enough sources to establish verifiability. No Start-Class article should be in any danger of being speedily deleted.	Provides some meaningful content, but the majority of readers will need more.	Provision of references to reliable sources should be prioritised; the article will also need substantial improvements in content and organisation.	Real analysis (as of November 2006)
Stub	A very basic description of the topic. More detailed criteria The article is either a very short article or a rough collection of information that will need much work to become a meaningful article. It is usually very short, but if the material is irrelevant or incomprehensible, an article of any length falls into this category.	Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition.	Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority.	Geodia gibberosa (as of July 2009)
FL	The article has attained featured list status. More detailed criteria The article meets the featured list criteria:વિકિપીડિયા:Featured list criteria	Professional standard; it comprehensively covers the defined scope, usually providing a complete set of items, and has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about those items.	No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available.	Avatar: The Last Airbender (season 3) (as of February 2009)
List	Meets the criteria of a stand-alone list, which is an article that contains primarily a list, usually consisting of links to articles in a particular subject area.	There is no set format for a list, but its organization should be logical and useful to the reader.	Lists should be lists of live links to Wikipedia articles, appropriately named and organized.	List of aikidoka (as of June 2007)

Template documentation[view] [edit] [history] [purge]

Usage instructions

• The code below is for customizing the template for a specific WikiProject. Fields are optional, and will default to generic examples if left blank.
  • Specifying the Project field will link the class labels to the appropriate quality category in the given project in the format "FA-Class Project articles".
  • Specifying article class examples will display the provided text in the example for the given quality.
  • The rows for Future, Book, Cat, Dab, Image, Portal, Project, Redirect, Template, and NA are optional and will not be displayed unless yes is specified for the respective "Future_cat", "Book_cat", "Cat_cat", "Dab_cat", "File_cat", "Portal_cat", "Project_cat", "Redirect_cat", "Template_cat", and "NA_cat" parameters.

• Copy and paste:

{{Grading scheme
|Project          = 
|FA_example       = 
|A_example        = 
|GA_example       = 
|B_example        = 
|C_example        = 
|Start_example    = 
|Stub_example     = 
|FL_example       = 
|List_example     = 
|Future_cat       = 
|Future_example   = 
|Book_cat         =
|Book_example     =
|Cat_cat          = 
|Cat_example      = 
|Dab_cat          = 
|Dab_example      =
|FM_cat           = 
|FM_example       = 
|File_cat        = 
|File_example    = 
|Portal_cat       = 
|Portal_example   = 
|Project_cat      = 
|Project_example  = 
|Redirect_cat     = 
|Redirect_example = 
|Template_cat     = 
|Template_example = 
|NA_cat           = 
|NA_example       = 
}}

See also

Standard class types
FA	A	GA	B
{{class|FA}}	{{class|A}}	{{class|GA}}	{{class|B}}
C	Start	Stub	FL
{{class|C}}	{{class|Start}}	{{class|Stub}}	{{class|FL}}
List	FM	NA	???
{{class|List}}	{{class|FM}}	{{class|NA}}	{{class|Unassessed}}
Non-standard class types
???	Category	Current	Disambig
{{class|Book}}	{{class|Category}}	{{class|Current}}	{{class|Disambig}}
File	Future	Merge	Needed
{{class|File}}	{{class|Future}}	{{class|Merge}}	{{class|Needed}}
Portal	Project	Redirect	Template
{{class|Portal}}	{{class|Project}}	{{class|Redirect}}	{{class|Template}}
Importance types
Top	High	Mid	Low
{{importance|Top}}	{{importance|High}}	{{importance|Mid}}	{{importance|Low}}
Bottom	NA	???
{{importance|Bottom}}	{{importance|NA}}	{{importance|Unknown}}

Class

• {{Article classification}}
• {{Grading scheme}}
• {{Assessment Class Summary}}
• {{Category class}}
• {{Articles by Quality}}
• {{Class}}
• {{Class/colour}}
• {{Class/icon}}

Importance

• {{Article importance}}
• {{Importance scheme}}
• {{Assessment Importance Summary}}
• {{Category importance}} / {{Cat priority}}
• {{Articles by Importance}}
• {{Importance}}
• {{Importance/colour}}
• {{Importance/icon}}

Hybrid

• {{Articles by Quality and Importance}}

Tool to add multiple templates to quality assessment pages

• {{WPBannerMeta/templatepage/qualheader|project =|topic =}}

For B rating evaluation

Copy and paste:
| B1 <!-- Ref and cites --> = y/n | B2 <!-- Coverage and accuracy --> = y/n | B3 <!-- Structure--> = y/n | B4 <!-- Grammar and style --> = y/n | B5 <!-- Supporting materials --> = y/n | B6 <!-- Appropriate and understandable --> = y/n

The above documentation is transcluded from ઢાંચો:Grading scheme/doc. (edit | history)
Editors can experiment in this template's sandbox (create | mirror) and testcases (create) pages.
Add categories to the /doc subpage. Subpages of this template.